Los Angeles Bets $466.6M That Subsidy Pulls Private Capital
The second Homes for LA round is bigger than the first and slower to arrive, handing the carrying cost to sponsors who can sit through the calendar.
The Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously to approve a Notice of Funding Availability backed by $466.6 million to build and renovate affordable housing, which Connect CRE calls the largest pool of its kind in the city housing department's history; Mayor Karen Bass's approval is still pending. The money is distributed as grants and loans to developers, nonprofits and land trusts, and comes largely from Measure ULA, the mansion tax enacted in 2022, according to Los Angeles Times reporting relayed by Connect CRE.
The size alone puts this round on a sponsor's desk: $466.6 million is about 29 percent larger than the first Homes for LA round, which awarded nearly $361 million in April toward 5,241 units across 80 projects, per MyNewsLA. That works out to roughly $105.6 million in new money, and with round one's average building at about 65 units, the program is built for mid-size applicants rather than mega-projects. Divided across those 5,241 units, round one's public contribution comes to about $69,000 apiece—a gap-closer, the slice of a stack that makes a thin deal close; sponsors who underwrite it as the equity that builds the building will misprice both the money and the wait.
The wait is where the round gets harder: the NOFA is expected to be released October 13, applications close December 4, recipients are announced in February 2027, and the City Council reviews and approves awards by April. A developer applying in December is likely carrying land, predevelopment and soft costs into the following spring before any award is approved, which favors applicants with cheap capital and patience over those who need the money to close.
As this publication has argued, the apartment supply gap is being underwritten as a financing problem, and the affordable pipeline is where that shows up first. If Measure ULA's receipts track the high end of the for-sale market, as the mansion-tax label implies, the funding base moves with a segment the housing department does not control, which makes a 29 percent step-up difficult to treat as a baseline rather than a one-time commitment.
When applications close December 4, the number to watch is the applicant mix rather than the dollar total. Land trusts and nonprofits filing the bulk of the requests would say the city's $69,000-a-unit layer is carrying more of the stack than the private side is, and that the sponsors who can sit through round two's calendar are the ones still standing for round three.