ESJ buys a 2021 Kannapolis build at a replacement-cost discount
Pearlmark's $19.9 million loan covers two-thirds of the $29.5 million deal, which the buyer says undercut what the same building would cost to construct today.
ESJ Capital Partners paid $29.5 million for The Bridge of Cabarrus, a 144-unit Kannapolis community that Pickering & Co. Real Estate built in 2021, a price that works out to roughly $205,000 a door and which the buyer says undercuts what the same six buildings would cost to deliver today. Pearlmark supplied $19.9 million of the financing, arranged by Brian Gaswirth, Brad Woolard and Luke Maganas of JLL Capital Markets and first reported by the Atlanta Business Chronicle, covering two-thirds of the purchase, or about $138,000 a unit.
The asset is 95% occupied across six three-story buildings, with one-, two- and three-bedroom units and an amenity package of pool, fitness center, dog park and car washing station; no cap rate appears in the coverage, leaving the buyer's replacement-cost argument to carry the price.
That argument is the trade. A buyer anchoring to construction cost rather than to in-place rent growth is buying vintage, and the 2021 delivery date is the point. Entitlement, construction and lease-up risk were retired by the seller; what ESJ bought is a stabilized asset whose price is set by the gap between a 2021 basis and today's cost of putting up the same six buildings. Pickering built in 2021 and sold five years later, and the coverage gives neither its cost basis nor its return.
The apartment trade has split, as this publication has argued, with the spread between garden-asset doors now an operator and location read rather than a market read. This deal lands on the construction-cost half of that split: at two-thirds leverage and 95% occupancy, the floor under a five-year-old suburban asset is set by what a replacement would cost to build, not by how fast rents are moving.
ESJ says it is still hunting Charlotte-area multifamily between $20 million and $60 million, from the upper end of Class B product through Class A. This purchase sits at the bottom of that band, making it a template rather than a trophy: small enough to underwrite on a per-door basis, financed by a single lender, and priced off the alternative rather than the outlook.
Watch whether a second Kannapolis-area trade of similar vintage clears near this number. If it does, construction cost is doing the work and the bid for 2021-vintage product has a floor under it. If it clears lower, rent growth was carrying more of this one than the buyer's framing admits.
A buyer anchoring to construction cost rather than to in-place rent growth is buying vintage, and the 2021 delivery date is the point.